NewsHR & Rewards

Employees in Low-Quality Jobs Change Employers at Nearly Twice the Rate, Gallup Finds: What the 2026 Job Quality Study Means for Retention Budgets

Gallup released the second American Job Quality Study on October 22, with Jobs for the Future and The Families and Workers Fund. Again, only about four in ten US workers meet its standard for a quality job. This year Gallup could follow the same people for a year, and that adds something HR and finance teams can use: employees in non-quality jobs in 2025 were nearly twice as likely to work for a different employer by 2026.

By Maciej Kamieniak5 min read
US workers in quality jobs, 202641%40% in 2025; statistically unchanged
Changed employers within a year15% vs 8%Non-quality vs quality jobs in 2025
โ€œVery likelyโ€ to leave in 12 months16% vs 7%Non-quality vs quality jobs, 2026
Highly satisfied with their job59% vs 24%Quality vs non-quality jobs

What Gallup measured

The study surveyed 17,874 US adults aged 18 to 75 who had worked for pay in the previous seven days. Fieldwork ran from January 26 to March 24, 2026, by web and mail, using the Gallup Panel and a separate address-based sample. More than 11,000 people answered in both 2025 and 2026. That panel is what lets Gallup report who actually moved jobs, not only who says they might.

A job counts as โ€œqualityโ€ only if it meets a minimum standard on five dimensions. These are financial well-being (fair pay, stable work and benefits), workplace culture and safety, growth and development, agency and voice, and work structure and autonomy. In 2026, 41% of all workers and 40% of employees passed. The rate was 52% for managers and leaders and 36% for individual contributors. By industry it ranged from 57% in professional and business services to 23% in retail and 22% in warehousing. Gen Z employees were at 32%.

Money is part of the picture. Nearly one in three employees (31%) say they are just getting by or finding it difficult to get by, and 27% say they live comfortably. Among employees in quality jobs, 44% live comfortably. Among the rest, only 16% do.

What predicts plans to leave

Gallup modeled which parts of job quality predict an employee's plan to leave within 12 months, controlling for age, education, race and ethnicity, and gender. Overall, employees in non-quality jobs had 3.4 times the odds of planning to leave. Four of the five dimensions mattered on their own:

Odds of planning to leave in the next 12 months, low vs high category on each job-quality dimension (Gallup, American Job Quality Study 2026)
DimensionOdds of leaving, low vs high
Workplace culture and safety3.1ร—
Growth and development opportunities2.5ร—
Financial well-being2.0ร—
Agency and voice1.6ร—
Work structure and autonomyNo significant association
Non-quality vs quality job overall3.4ร—

Respect shows up clearly. Of employees who strongly disagree that they are treated with respect at work, 32% are very likely to leave. Of those who strongly agree, 9% are. One in four employees (25%) report discrimination or unfair treatment, and 22% report bullying, threats or harassment. Among employees mistreated by a supervisor, 27% are very likely to leave, compared with 21% when it comes from coworkers and 19% from customers.

Three questions HR and finance teams will ask

Does a quality job cause people to stay? The study does not prove that. It shows a strong association, and the year-over-year figure counts anyone working for a different employer, whether they quit or were let go. Gallup also says the link between quality jobs and better health is an association, not a proven cause.

What about absence and health costs? In quality jobs, 51% of employees rate their health excellent or very good, against 35% elsewhere. Combining its data with the 2023 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, Gallup estimates about four missed workdays a year from illness or injury in quality jobs and five in the rest. It also estimates annual private-insurance healthcare spending of about $5,200 versus $6,200, or 16% lower. One note: the report's key findings call that โ€œ20% fewer workdays,โ€ while Gallup's study web page says โ€œ15% fewer.โ€ We quote both and did not choose between them.

Is recognition one of the five dimensions? Not by name. The study measures pay, benefits, respect, safety, growth, voice and schedules. It does not test reward or recognition programs. Respect from managers and fair treatment, the strongest predictors of leaving, are where recognition practices usually sit. We drew that link ourselves, and the study does not test it.

What it means for HR, rewards and finance teams

  • Turnover risk follows how people are treated. Culture and safety, plus growth, predict plans to leave more strongly than pay does in Gallup's model. Budget for manager behavior, such as regular, specific recognition and fair treatment, alongside the merit pool, not after it.
  • Target where the gap is largest. Individual contributors (36%), retail (23%), warehousing (22%) and Gen Z employees (32%) have the lowest quality-job rates. These frontline groups are often left out of desk-based recognition tools. Rewards they can redeem on a phone, such as digital gift cards, reach them.
  • Financial strain is real for a third of the workforce. With 31% of employees just getting by, a reward's cash value and flexibility matter. In the US, gift cards from an employer are taxable wages, so plan any gross-up in advance; see are gift cards taxable to employees.
  • Measure it in your own data. Gallup says it built the study so employers can measure job quality themselves, and the survey data are public. Compare your own respect, growth and intent-to-leave survey scores with who actually leaves over the next year.

For wider context, see our employee turnover statistics for 2026 and manager effectiveness statistics, and the case for recognition as a turnover lever. To size a program, use the CFO framework for an employee rewards budget. Rewordin's reward catalog lists gift card brands employees can choose from, and the bulk gift card API sends digital cards to named recipients through a REST API or a CSV upload. If you are planning year-end awards, read our news on what employees say about holiday gifts in 2026.

Sources

  1. Gallup, with Jobs for the Future and The Families and Workers Fund, โ€œThe American Job Quality Study: 2026 State of the U.S. Labor Forceโ€ study page and full report PDF (gallup.com), the primary source. It covers the methodology, quality-job rates, year-over-year employer changes, intent to leave, odds ratios, respect and mistreatment, health, missed work and healthcare-cost estimates, financial well-being and the 40% frontline replacement-cost figure. The web page is the source of the โ€œ15% fewerโ€ missed-workday figure. gallup.com
  2. Emily Peck, โ€œA majority of Americans have low-quality jobs,โ€ Axios, republished by Yahoo Finance (October 22, 2026). Source for the release timing and the labor-market context of low unemployment and slow hiring. finance.yahoo.com
  3. โ€œOnly 41% Of U.S. Workers Have Quality Jobs, According To Gallup,โ€ Allwork.Space (October 22, 2026). Independent summary used to cross-check the headline figures. allwork.space
All sources accessed October 26, 2026. The 1,000-employee illustration and the $126,000 figure are our own arithmetic; the $45,000 salary is an assumption, not a Gallup figure.

This article summarizes a workforce survey. The findings are associations, not proof of cause. It is not legal, tax or financial advice.

About the author

MK
Maciej Kamieniak
Founder & CEO, Rewordin

Maciej has worked in the digital gift card and rewards industry for over 5 years. For this story he read Gallup's American Job Quality Study page and the full 2026 report, including its methodology, and checked the headline figures against Axios' and Allwork.Space's coverage. He flagged the missed-workday discrepancy between Gallup's page and report, and he worked out the 1,000-employee turnover illustration.